Tuesday, April 28, 2015

DROPS OF FAITH: WATER IN ISLAM

Drops of Faith: Water in Islam

Source:


 
As a universal religion born initially in the harsh deserts of Arabia to complete the message of former prophets and convey the divine revelation in its last testament (Qur’an), Islam ascribes the most sacred qualities to water as a life-giving, sustaining and purifying resource.
It is the origin of all life on earth, the substance from which Allah created man (Al-Furqan 25:54), and the Holy Qur’an emphasizes its centrality: {We made from water every living thing} (Al-Anbiyaa’ 21:30). Water is the primary element that existed even before the heavens and the earth did:
{And it is He who created the heavens and the earth in six days, and his Throne was upon the waters} (Hud 11:7). 
The water of rain, rivers and fountains runs through the pages of the Qur’an to symbolize Allah’s benevolence:
{He sends down saving rain for them when they have lost all hope and spreads abroad His mercy} (Ash-Shura 42:28).



Read Also:



·         10 Green Hadiths
·         Green Tips from the Sunnah
·         Nature, Too, Praises Allah
At the same time, the believers are constantly reminded that it is Allah Who gives sweet water to the people, and that He can just as easily withhold it:
{Consider the water which you drink. Was it you that brought it down from the rain cloud or We? If We had pleased, We could make it bitter}(56:68-70)
In this verse the believers are warned that they are only the guardians of Allah’s creation on earth; they must not take His law into their own hands.

Facing Allah in Radiant Purity: Ablutions
Cleanliness is half of faith,” the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) tells his companions in one of the Hadiths. (Muslim) These well-known and oft-repeated words reveal not only the central importance of purity and cleanliness, but also the essential role water plays in Islamic religion. Purification through ablution is an obligatory component of the Islamic prayer ritual; prayers carried out in an impure state are not valid. In addition, a more thorough ritual is required on specific occasions.
The Qur’an tells believers that Allah {loves those who cleanse themselves} (At-Tawbah 9:108) and instructs them:

{O you who believe, when you rise to pray, wash your faces and your hands as far as the elbow, wipe your heads, and [wash] your feet to the ankle. If you are in a state of ceremonial impurity, cleanse yourselves… Allah does not wish to burden you, but desires to purify you} (Al-Ma’idah 5:6)

Allah will reward those who purify themselves, as proved by the hadith reported by Muslim:
“My Ummah will come on the Resurrection Day with brightness on their foreheads, hands and feet from the effect of ablution.”
Follow the Shari`ah Zone



Entire chapters of the Hadiths are dedicated to ablutions, detailing when and how they should be performed, and explaining in which order the various parts of the body should be washed, how the feet are to be cleaned, how the head should be rubbed - even how often the nostrils should be cleared.
They also specify that the water used for ablutions should be pure (mutlaq) which means it should not be mixed with any other liquid. Water from rain, wells, flowing water from taps, rivers and streams, and still water from lakes, ponds, seas and oceans, are all considered to be pure and suitable for ritual ablution.

The body and the Soul: Physical Purity in Religious Contexts
There are two types of ablution. Wudu’, the minor purification carried out before prayer, consists of washing the hands, the face, the forearms, the head and the feet. The Hadiths explain that by performing wudu’ the believer washes away sin, and drives the devil away.
The process of wudu’ is described in a very physical way, as though the sin were a visible stain, an insidious little demon that clings to the believer and can only be chased away with water. Thus when a believer washes his face during wudu’, the Hadiths say that every sin that he contemplated with his eyes is washed away from his face with the last drop of water; when he washes his hands, every sin they wrought is effaced; and when he washes his feet, every sin toward which his feet have walked is washed away, until he comes out pure of all sins.

Ghusl is the major purification, which cleanses the whole body from impurities and is required after intercourse, menstruation, childbirth, when adopting Islam, and after death. It is also recommended before important celebrations and before the Hajj.

Cleansing the Mind: Spiritual Purity
Wudu’ and ghusl are both part of the act of worship, rituals that are mandatory before starting prayers, or touching the Qur’an. As such, these rituals include a spiritual component, which means that even if one is physically clean, but has not carried out the purification in ritual fashion, it is not permitted to even touch the Qur’an.

This prohibition has nothing to do with physical purity - whether one has clean hands or whether one might stain the pages of the Holy Book, for example. It is purely a question of reverence towards the Word of Allah. Thus physical purity alone does not suffice to arrive at a state of tahara, ritual purity.

Ablution should not be carried out mechanically, but only after niyyat (intention), the silent expression of sincerity and obedience to Allah. This is the spiritual component of the purification ritual: while the body is purified with water, the mind must be completely focused on Allah. Carrying out wudu’ or ghusl simply for refreshment in hot weather, for example, makes it invalid.

The physical and spiritual components of the purification ritual reflect the Islamic principle of tawhid (unity): body and mind should be united in the performance of religious duties. Islam means “surrendering to Allah”, and Muslims, “those who have surrendered to Allah”, do so with body and soul. An inscription in the baths of Granada’s old Moorish Quarter expresses this link between physical and spiritual purity. It says that the body is the mirror of the soul, and therefore “outer stains suggest inner ones as well.”

Saving Water



The Hadiths urge moderation and thriftiness in the use of water during ablution. The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) warned that wudu’ should not be performed more than three times in a row before each prayer; the Prophet himself (peace and blessings be upon him) washed each part only two or three times without ever going beyond three, even if water supplies were abundant. Commentators add:
“The men of science disapprove of exaggeration and also of exceeding the number of ablutions of the Prophet.”
The Hadiths also offer advice for times of scarcity, using the Prophet’s actions as a guideline. One day when the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) was travelling through the desert with his companions, his wife `A’ishah lost her necklace. They spent time searching for it and when prayer time came, the company was nowhere near a water source. It was then that Allah revealed the ritual of tayammum to the Prophet:
{O you who believe, (…) if you are sick or on a journey, (…) and if you can find no water, then have recourse to clean dust and wipe your faces and your hands with it. } (An-Nisaa’ 4:43).

Clean earth can thus be used as a substitute for water in exceptional circumstances. Indeed, the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) acknowledged the pure nature of earth when he said: “The earth has been created for me as a mosque and as a means of purification.”

Islam and Christianity: Two Religions, Two Waters
One of the fundamental distinctions between Islam and Christianity lies in their view of the relationship between body and soul, and this also indirectly reveals a difference in the valuing of water. Where Islam assumes a unity of body and soul, Christian philosophy sees the two as independent entities. Inspired by Plato’s philosophy of dualism, it conceives of a rational, controllable mind or soul, and a body that is governed by blind necessity and that cannot always be kept in check by the mind.
The idea of separation of body and soul was adopted by the Church and strongly dominated the ideology of early Christian ascetics. They believed physical suffering and deprivation would purify the spirit and bring the faithful closer to Christ, leading to decidedly questionable ideas about purity and cleanliness. Saints of early Christianity boasted that water had never touched their feet except when they had had to wade across a stream. St. Jerome also denounced bathing as a pagan practice and affirmed that “He who has bathed in Christ [i.e. has been baptized] does not need a second bath.”

This abhorrence of bathing and everything related to it persisted far into the Middle Ages and went beyond the realms of the clergy. During the Spanish Reconquista of the fifteenth century, Queen Isabella famously declared she would not change her robe until Granada fell. Given that the siege lasted eight months, one can imagine the odour that surrounded the pious Catholic Queen. As mentioned above, in Islam, the unity of body and soul means regular ablution and bathing is a religious requirement.
Christian baptism, in which newborn babies [or adults] are blessed by holy water and accepted into the Church, also reveals a different view of water in the two religions. In Islam, all water is sent as a gift from Allah. This is repeated many times in the Qur’an: {We provided you with sweet water} (Al-Murslat 77:27). All water, as long as it is mutlaq (pure), can be used for ablution.

The holy water that is used in Christian baptism is of a different nature; it is not just any water, but water that has been blessed in the name of Christ. This blessing gives the water a special quality, an added value that sets it apart and elevates it above other water. 
Records from the early Church Fathers show that holy water was believed to chase away evil spirits and cure a variety of illnesses. Many Christians kept baptismal water in their houses throughout the year, or else used it to water their fields, vineyards and gardens. In Islam, water, in general, is Allah's blessing:
{And you see the land dried up, but when We send down water upon it, it trembles, and swells, and put forth every lovely kind (of growth).} (Al-Hajj 22:5)

The Bathhouse and the Drinking Fountain: Water’s Legacy in the Islamic City
Water’s importance in Islamic culture has, over the centuries, also left its mark on the design of the city. The fountains, cisterns, and public baths that can still be found today in cities around the Islamic world survive as a physical testimony to the central role water plays in Muslim society.
The hammam, the public bathhouse, has a long history that goes back to pre-Islamic times. Tradition attributes the creation of the bathhouse to King Solomon and Bilqis, the Queen of Sheba (see Al-Tha`labi, The Stories of the Prophets for more on the origin of the hammam). While scholars generally agree that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) never visited a hammam himself, they were much frequented until running water was installed in homes.

While the visit to the hammam was, of course, in the first place part of the purification ritual, the steam and hot water also served medicinal purposes, and many visited them for health reasons. Today hammams are not frequented as often as they were, except in North African countries like Tunisia and Morocco, where visits to the hammam have become a social event as much as a component of the religious ritual.

Before running water was installed in households, inhabitants of the Islamic city fetched their water from fountains, cisterns or wells. In many of the medieval towns, the water source was a place where women and girls met and chatted when they came to fill up their jugs and pitchers every day. Today little remains of these social hubs with the exception of the sabil, the drinking water fountain that existed through the Ottoman Empire.

Sabils were usually charitable donations from rich and powerful citizens, and their water was free for all. They were more than just water sources; soon buildings were designed around them, and they evolved to become architectural features within the urban texture, monuments to water’s holy qualities. Many sabils are combined with small madrasas (schools) on the first floor.

They are called sabil-kuttub, literally “fountains of books” or “fountain schools”. Hidden in the narrow alleys and lanes of Islamic Cairo, the sabil and the sabil-kuttubcan still be found. Some are built of wood and decorated with fine carvings; some look like baroque tea pavilions, dripping with ornaments, elaborate stone and metalwork; others are hardly recognizable, crumbling stone structures hidden under layers of grime and dust. Today, as the majority of homes have running water, the sabil has fallen into disuse, though some of the madrasas within them still function.

Shafa and Shirb: Water and Islamic Law
The harsh desert climate of Arabia, the Near East and Saharan North Africa makes water a highly valuable and precious resource here. Islamic law, the Shari`ah, goes into great detail on the subject of water to ensure the fair and equitable distribution of water within the community.
The word "Shari`ah" itself is closely related to water. It is included in early Arab dictionaries and originally meant “the place from which one descends to water”. Before the advent of Islam in Arabia, the shari`ah was, in fact, a series of rules about water use: the shuraat al-maa were the permits that gave right to drinking water. The term later evolved to include the body of laws and rules given by Allah.

Water is a gift from Allah. It is one of the three things that every Muslim is entitled to: grass (pasture for cattle), water, and fire. Water should be freely available to all, and any Muslim who withholds unneeded water commits a sin. The Hadiths say that among the three people Allah will ignore on the Day of Resurrection there will be “the man who, having water in excess of his needs, refuses it to a traveler...” (Abu Dawud and authenticated by Al-Albani)

There are two fundamental precepts that guide the rights to water in the Shari`ah: shafa, the right of thirst, establishes the universal right for humans to quench their thirst and that of their animals; shirb, the right of irrigation, gives all users the right to water their crops. Both rules are interpreted in different ways by the various schools of Islam, and their implementation varies from region to region, from village to village, each community applying the law to suit geographical and social circumstances.

Boiling, Festering and Simmering Waters: Punishing the Non-believers



Allah does not always send water as a gift. It can also be a violent punishment. The unbelievers and those who take their religion “as jest and frolic” will be burned by rains of fire, and boiling water will be poured over them. In Hell, the unbelievers will be forced to drink from a source of simmering water (Al-Ghashiyah 88:5). They will drink boiling, festering water (Al-An`am 6:70) that will tear their innards apart (Muhammad 47:15), and they will be dragged in fetters through boiling water (Ghafir 40:72) and receive it over their heads (Al-Hajj 22:19), burning their skin.
In the earthly context, water can also be a source of suffering. Indeed the quantity and quality of the water Allah sends down from heaven determines whether it will be a blessing or a punishment. The Qur’an distinguishes between different types of water: {one palatable and sweet, the other salt and bitter} (Fatir 35:12) Salt, bitter, and brackish water cannot quench thirst or bring life to the land; it will only bring suffering. It is not only the quality; the quantity of water also determines whether it will bring life or destruction.
Again, this decision lies in Allah’s power: {Who sent down water from the heaven in measure} (Az-Zukhruf 43:11). This means the rains can bring life to barren land, bringing forth crops for the people and their cattle (As-Sajdah 32:27), but the Qur’an also speaks of rains of hail (An-Nur 24:43), rains of fire (11:82) and of punishment {darkness, thunder and lightning.} (Al-Baqarah 2:19)

“Water, Greenery and a Lovely Face”: Images of Islamic Paradise
The poetic and Qur’anic metaphors in which water is used to symbolize Paradise, righteousness and Allah’s mercy are, however, much more frequent. From the numerous Qur’anic references to cooling rivers, fresh rain and fountains of flavored drinking water in Paradise, we can deduce that water is the essence of the gardens of Paradise. It flows beneath and through them, bringing coolness and greenery, and quenching thirst. The believers will be rewarded for their piety by {rivers of water incorruptible; and rivers of milk unchanging in taste, and rivers of wine, delicious to the drinkers, and rivers of honey purified} (Muhammad 47:15).
The water in Paradise is never stagnant; it flows, rushes, unlike the festering waters of Hell. The Qur’an also equates the waters of Paradise with moral uprightness:
{In the garden is no idle talk; there is a gushing fountain} (Al-Ghashiyah 88:11-12).
The many specific statements about the topography of Paradise in the Qur’an led to many attempts to map Paradise. Throughout history, Muslim rulers from Moorish Spain to Persia sought to reproduce the image of Paradise in the design of their palace gardens, creating elaborate water features, pools and fountains. The gardens of the Alhambra in Spanish Granada, the Bagh-é-Tarikhi in Iran’s Kashan, and the gardens of the imperial palaces in Morocco’s Marrakesh all testify to this desire to emulate Qur’anic Paradise on earth. All are designed around water features and fountains that have been subtly woven into the layout of the beautiful parks, hence combining water and the beauty of natural landscape to fill the human soul with faith, joy and happiness.

Wednesday, April 22, 2015

AHADI NA DHULMA KATIKA UISLAM

 DAAWA  KWA  WATU

Imepokelewa kutoka kwa Abu Hurayrah (رضي الله عنه)  kwamba Mtume (صلى الله عليه  وآله وسلم ) amesema: 
 ((Allaah Aliyetukuka Amesema: Watu watatu Mimi  Nitakhasimiana nao Siku ya Qiyaamah: Mtu aliyempa nduguye ahadi kwa kutumia Jina Langu kisha akavunja ahadi hiyo. Mtu aliyemuuza muungwana na akala thamani yake. Na mtu aliyemwajiri mwajiriwa naye akammalizia kazi yake, wala asimpe ujira wake)). Al-Bukhaariy

Mafunzo Na Hidaya:

Maamrisho ya kutimiza ahadi
 [Al-Baqarah 2: 177
Al-Maaidah 5: 1]. 

Na asiyetimiza ahadi, atakuwa na sifa ya wanafiki ambao walikuwa hawaachi kuvunja ahadi. 
[Al-Baqarah 2: 100,
 Al-Anfaal 8: 56,
 Ar-‘Rad 13: 25 
[Rejea Hadiyth namba  18].


وَأَوْفُوا بِالْعَهْدِ ۖ إِنَّ الْعَهْدَ كَانَ مَسْئُولًا ﴿٣٤﴾

Na timizeni ahadi; hakika ahadi daima ni ya kuulizwa (Siku ya Qiyaamah) Al-Israa (17: 34)

Kutimiza ahadi ni miongoni mwa sifa zitakazomfikisha Muumin Peponi
 [Ar-Ra’d 13: 20-24,
 Al-Ma’arij 70: 32,
 Al-Muuminuun 23: 8].

Inaruhusiwa kuvunja kiapo kwa kubadilisha jambo ovu kwa jambo jema. [Rejea Hadiyth namba 5].

Allaah (سبحانه وتعالى) Amemsifu Nabii Ismaa’iyl kwa sifa ya kutimizia ahadi [Maryam 19: 54].

Uislamu unahimiza haki baina ya watu na uhuru wa binaadamu.

Makatazo ya kumdhulumu mwajiriwa kwa kutokumlipa ujira wake, kwani kufanya hivyo ni hiana, nayo ni dhulma.


 وَمَا كَانَ لِنَبِيٍّ أَن يَغُلَّ ۚ وَمَن يَغْلُلْ يَأْتِ بِمَا غَلَّ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ ۚ ثُمَّ تُوَفَّىٰ كُلُّ نَفْسٍ مَّا كَسَبَتْ وَهُمْ لَا يُظْلَمُونَ ﴿١٦١﴾

Na haipasi kwa Nabii yeyote kukhini. Na yeyote atakayekhini atakuja na kile alichokikhini Siku ya Qiyaamah. Kisha italipwa kamilifu kila nafsi yale iliyoyachuma nao hawatodhulumiwa. 
 Aal-‘Imraan (3: 161)

Mtu anayekhasimiwa na Allaah (سبحانه وتعالى), tena Siku ya Qiyaamah, atakuwa katika adhabu kali. Hivyo, ni juu yetu tufanye  yatakayotupatia uhusiano mzuri na Muumbaji wetu, na mambo yote Aliyotukataza tuwe mbali nayo.

SEVEN REMARKABLE THINGS ABOUT KHADIJA, WIFE OF THE PROPHET OF ISLAM

7 Remarkable Things About Khadija, Wife of the Prophet of Islam.

By  Yasmina  Blackburn

Posted: Updated:

I often get into debates with people about women in Islam. How we dress. How we don't dress. What we think or don't think or should-be-thinking. I get into debates about feminism. What it is and what it isn't. I think I've spawned permanent foes because I don't care to apply the label, feminist, to describe myself. (I'm not one for labels, sorry. But if it's even required of me, "Muslim woman" suits me just fine.) But if we could agree for a moment that there exists a pure definition of the word feminist to mean: awesomely fierce to the millionth degree, then I'd like to introduce you to Islam's first feminist.

Her name is Khadijah bint Khuwaylid. She was the wife of the Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him.) And she is one of the people that I think about when I face or debate issues surrounding women today. Khadija's existence precedes mine by more than 1,400 years; and, if I can at the very least, continuously strive to emulate her character, I will consider myself a success in life.

7 things you might not know about the awesomely fierce, Khadija (may God be pleased with her):

1. She was a successful and esteemed business woman.
I would give anything to do an on-the-job, ride-along with Khadija. Gladly swipe my car for a camel- my laptop for a government-issued glass weight to measure goods in trade. What could I learn in one day of shadowing this highly-respected business leader, trading furniture, pottery and silks? Khadija was born to a father who was a successful merchant in their Quraysh tribe of Macca. She inherited her father's skills in a time in history where society was male-dominated and dangerous. Upon her father's death, she took over the business and traded goods through the primary commerce centers at that time, from Mecca to Syria and to Yemen, hiring the most trustworthy men of character to brave the dangerous trade routes. Her business was larger than all of the Quraysh trades combined and the most acclaimed with a reputation of fair-dealing and high-quality goods. She had a keen eye and was highly intuitive, earning the monikers, Ameerat-Quraysh ("Princess of Quraysh") and al-Tahira ("The Pure One") due to her stellar reputation. Khadija knew what she was doing business-wise, never compromising her modesty or integrity to succeed in the male-dominated trades- hiring only those that could meet these standards. Glass ceiling? Hah! 1,400 years ago, yes, Khadija shattered it.

2. She turned down many marriage proposals.
Being the most successful woman around, rich in worldly attainment as well as character, it seems Khadija faced a consistent campaign of men seeking her hand in marriage. She was married twice before her wedlock to the Prophet; both of these marriages produced children and both left her widowed. Her keen sense of character left her picky; and, she was less than eager to suffer another painful loss of a husband. She resigned herself to being a widowed woman taking care of herself and her family. Until ...

3. She asked the Prophet to marry her.
Love comes when you aren't looking, or so I have heard. (And experienced.) Khadija learned of the stellar character of Muhammad as well as his experience managing caravans on the trade routes accompanying his uncle, Abu Talib. She hired him into her conglomerate. Marriages at this time were typically necessary for survival and not always about love as we know it in today's world. Khadija didn't need a husband to take care of her financially. And Muhammad did not have the means to seek a wife. She fell in love with him, and through a friend, asked him to marry her. (He said yes.)

4. She was 15 years older than Muhammad.
If Khadija's story hasn't broken stereotypes about Islam yet, it might intrigue you to know that she was 40 years old when she married Muhammad. He was 25.

5. She was an ideal wife; theirs was a true love story.
"Your wives are a garment for you, and you are a garment for them." (Qur'an 2:187)
Taking multiple wives was a common practice, yet Khadija and Muhammad's marriage was monogamous until her death 25 years later. Muhammad's prophethood began during his marriage to Khadija, when he received the first of God's revelations through the Angel Gabriel that left him frightened, strained and feeling alone when no one believed in him. Khadija comforted her husband and encouraged him during the most difficult days of his life. She bore him 6 children. He loved no one more than Khadija during his lifetime.

6. She was the first Muslim.
Khadija, the mother of Islam, was the first person on earth to accept Muhammad as the final prophet of God and accept the revelations that culminated into the Holy Qur'an. She was greeted with "Salam" (peace) by God himself as well as the Angel Gabriel. She bequeathed her worldly goods and put herself in the face of danger to stand by the Prophet Muhammad as Islam became established in the land.

7. She spent her worldly riches on the poor.
In Islam, whether rich or poor, one's financial condition is a test. Khadija gave her earnings to the poor and to the orphans, to the widows and the sick. She helped poor girls get married and provided their dowry.
Khadija was one of history's most remarkable women. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) once said that the four greatest women of mankind were: Khadija bint Khuwaylid, Fatima bint Muhammad (his youngest daughter,) Mary bint Emran (the Virgin Mary) and Asiya bint Muzahim (the wife of Pharaoh.) Khadija continues to inspire people to this day who revere her for taking great care of the Prophet of Islam and for showing the world, through her behavior, what a pious, modest and courageous woman can accomplish. The example she left for mankind remains timeless.

Monday, April 20, 2015

LOVE THE MASJID


"Whosoever wishes to Love Allah SWT, should love me. Whosoever loves me Should love my companions. Whosoever loves My Companions, should love the Quran. Whosoever loves the Quran should love the Masjid (Mosque)." (Qurtubi)

Side comments on practical applications:

1.   Are we sure, we love the Masjid?

2.   If you are sure, what evidence do you have?

3.   Are you member of Mosque committee trying to defraud on opportunities or nominate Imamship as a gesture to few or purely to improve Ummah's reflections?

4.   Have you ever contributed any substantial amount apart from or the exception of small token to basket at prayer time to the Masjid?

5.   Have you ever checked the ceiling, fans, loud speakers, electrical sockets, mats or carpets, cleaning rags etc to improve immensely to the welfare of worshippers?

6.   Have you ever secretly gave small amount to Imam or Muezzin or other Masjid support staff?

7.   Are you just coming to Masjid to pray (five times and Jummat etc) or also making further additions?

8.   Are you a member of Dawah committee of the Masjid? Do you give Dawah or Sermon on show-off knowledge or making presentations on critical aspects and religious seasonal effects?

9.   Do you invite from time to time learned scholars from outside to give lectures on certain topics?

10.   In your Masjid, do you have current contact list (secretly kept) in case of any problems i.e. death/funeral, sickness, theft/robbery, naming ceremonies, weddings etc.

11.   In your Masjid, do you train or caution your Muezzins' calling lapses?

12.   Do you take record of absentees and follow up?

13.   In your Masjid, do you have books or pamphlets or articles in your book shelves? If yes, do people ever open the books etc. 

14.   Do women pray in your Masjid? If yes, do have separate entries?

15.   Do you Have separate ablution area? If yes, are they taken care off hygienically? We noticed some areas, you remove shoes before going into toilet? How is your toilet separated from ablution spot?

16.  In your Masjid, do you have elders where their advise is reckoned? Etc.

Sunday, April 19, 2015

SATAN IS CLEVER ... HERE IS ONE OF HS TRICKS !!!


Satan is Clever... Here is One of His Tricks

 





Read Also:






·         Your Shields
·         The Cunning of Satan Is Weak
·         Your Heart and Gates of Satan
The twenty-second verse of Surat Al-A`raf is a long one, but in this brief reminder, I want to share with you the first part of the expression that is used in it, that has just an incredible amount of wisdom in it for life in our dealings with Satan.
Allah Almighty is describing how Satan got our parents, Adam and Hawwa (Peace be upon them), to make the mistake that they made.
What was his strategy to get them to listen to him? Not just what he said to them, we all know that he whispered to them, we all know that he offered them eternity and that they could stay in Jannah. We know that, but how did he do it? What method did he use?
That method is important to understand, and it is captured in the first expression of the verse, (Fadallahuma Bighurur). The verb dalla is used when you draw a bucket, which is called dalw in Arabic. Another related verb is adla, which means to drop a bucket down and pull it right back up. You know in the old times there is a well and you kind of crank up the water?  You know, and you pull the bucket back up, this is adla.
But Dalla is to slowly lower the bucket, or to put a bucket, you know, for a very primitive way of hunting an animal. You have some food, like a carrot or something, you put it inside the bucket and it is tied to a rope, and the animal comes and you sort of pull it little, by little, by little towards yourself, and the animal follows it. This is actually called dalla and that is exactly how Satan works.
Follow the Shari`ah Zone



Satan didn't go out and say, "Disobey Allah!" He offered it, just a small little bit of compromise, and they listened. And then he offered just a little bit more.
He may have whispered to them, "It's harmless, what I'm saying isn't haram, I'm just saying, take it a little bit easy, you know? You don't have to eat from this tree.  I'm not saying you should eat from the tree, I'm just saying at least check it out. It's a beautiful tree, there's no harm in looking at it, is there?"
Now look, Allah's commandment was {Do not go near this tree} (Al-A`raf 7:19). So, Satan may have started with them saying, "Look, at least you are not touching it, okay? Just go near it, what's the big deal?"
And when they go near, "You know what, it is not like you are not supposed to climb it, you are just not supposed to eat from it. Just have a little climb, it is not big deal."
It's not just one time. The word dalla also implies that these suggestions came a day, then another day, then another day, like this was a process for Satan. It was not like he whispered to Adam (peace be upon him) and immediately he went and he ate from the tree; rather, there was actually an entire, strategic plan; little, by little, by little winning over the argument.
And that is what he does to us till this day. This is the reason it is mentioned in the Qur'an. That he drew them out using deception.
In other words, there are things that are clearly wrong. You and I know that, there are things that are clearly, clearly wrong.  But there are a lot of small, not as clearly wrong steps that are there, that you should have the sense to know that if I take this one tiny step, tomorrow I will be taking another tiny step, and then another, and then another, and before I know it, I will end up in the wrong.
So you have to put protective measures in place. And when you put those protective measures in place, it keeps you from falling into trouble. Now Satan comes, and he does not attack directly; he does not tell you to make the haram into the halal. That's too direct, and the Muslim will say, "No, it's obviously haram, I'm not going to do that."



Rather, he comes and says, "Listen, this one little step I am asking you to take, it is clearly not haram, that is not wrong, you can do that much. There is nobody that can blame you for that."
Then people come and say to the scholar, "Hey, so I know that drinking is wrong, but can I hang out with friends who drink? I am not going to the bar or anything, but they sometimes drink in my office, can I just be with them? Because you know, they are my friends. Can I at least do that? Is it absolutely haram for me to do that?"
And the scholar will say something like, "I advise you not to do that, it is not a good idea, it is bad company."
"But is it haram? Is it absolutely haram?"
"Well I don't know if I can say it is absolutely."
"Okay thanks, I got my answer. It is not absolutely haram, which means I can do it." And that is how Satan gets you to first hang out with them.
Then they will say, "Hey, we're going to the bar, want to come along?" Then you go to the bar and you are just having a coke or whatever, and they are drinking their beer.
Eventually one late night, it's just a little bit, "can you just slip some in?" You know? Somebody gave it to you, or they slipped it into your drink, and you did not realize it, and you are like, "Well I didn't intend to do it."
It's just one thing after another, after another, after another subhan Allah.
So, Satan will not come at you directly calling you to do the wrong thing. Satan will try to make you just compromise, or just get on the road to the wrong. And by the way, when you are on that road, until you do the wrong, nobody can come out and directly tell you, "Listen, what you are doing is wrong." Because it is not wrong, it is on the road to it. If you don't recognize that you are being pulled slowly, but surely towards it, then you only have yourself to blame.
This is why Allah's commandment to Adam (peace be upon him) wasn't just do not eat from this tree, the advice was do not go near it. There is a big difference between those two things, and, therefore, you and I have to recognize that there are somethings that are clearly haram, but there is a road that leads to them. We have to watch out and not go on that track that Satan is trying to reel us into.
http://www.onislam.net/english/shariah/refine-your-heart/advice/485009-satan-devil-trick-islam-sin-adam-treeshaytan.html

GRACE BAZAAYA ANGERS MUSLIMS AT A PRESENTATION AT MAKERERE UNIVERSITY !!!!

National
Makerere official angers Muslims
Publish Date: Apr 19, 2015 Newvision,  Uganda.


By Eddie Ssejjoba

A Makerere University staff member angered Muslim students when she made utterances that associated terrorism with the Islamic religion.

“For us terrorism is Islam. We are appealing to you to talk to Muslims to be religious and help to create a sense of peace and brotherhood in them,” said Grace Bazaaya, a staff of the College of Computing and Information Science said while making her contribution during a public dialogue.

She said she was so worried about terrorism and the prevailing tension at the University after rumors started circulating around campus that terrorists ‘were about to hit’ the place.

Participants who were attending the dialogue on Religion, Insurgency, Terrorism and New World Order that discussed a topic on ‘Sharing Experience from Afghanistan’ were baffled when Bazaaya continued to say that some students had come to attend the dialogue ‘as agents of terrorism’.

Haron Aloko, an Afghan strategist and scholar was the guest speaker at the dialogue that was organized in solidarity with the students of Garissa University College in Kenya who were recently killed by Al Shabaab militants.  The meeting observed some minutes of silence for the fallen students.

“There was a general thinking here that terrorism is Islam, but we are telling students not to tag terrorism with any religion, instead we should find solutions to the root causes of grievances and try to open space for talking,” said associate Prof. Dr. Deusdedit R. K. Nkurunziza who was the facilitator.

Nkurunziza had to intervene to calm down angry students and other participants who complained that a senior member of the University had made direct attack on their religion.

“Let’s not lose tampers as people of academia, let us continue dialogue and find how we move forward and change mindset of our people on this topic,” Nkurunziza said.   

Some other participants asked Aloko to give answers as to whether it was proper to identify terrorism with Islam and why terror groups had chosen to work through Islam.

Muslim students who had been angered by the utterances read out verses in the Koran in a bid to explain that the faith promoted peace.

They said Islam was a religion of peace and brotherhood and there was no any reference to terrorism in the Holy Book.  

Katumba Salim, a student of social sciences asked whoever is concerned to make deep research on why terrorists had chosen to work through Islam instead of making ‘annoying conclusions’ about their faith.


Aloko however told participants that ‘nobody should be profiled or put under a cloud of suspicion simply because of their faith’.

He said there were many people affiliated with terrorism but were not followers of Islam and cited an example of the Islamic State group fighting in the several countries who he said had nothing to do with Islam.
He asked all stakeholders to concentrate on finding solutions to promote peace and dialogue and how to protect everyone.

“I know many people have pain inside and are seeking for answers. I don’t have the answers but let us continue to dialogue because the global players in terrorism don’t want this kind of debate, which they fear will give possible solutions,” he said.

A German educated Muslim, Aloko explained that he had lived with Christians, Jews and Muslims but every religion was for peace and said affiliating a particular faith with terrorism and extremism was not proper.
Extremists and terrorists, according to Aloko, use people who are hopeless, poor and desperate to achieve their political agenda.

Pastor Jerom Mugisha, a lecturer said the University community and Ugandans in general should instead mourn the killing of Christian students at Garissa and find solutions to terrorism instead of blaming it on religion.

“In history, Christians have killed more people than Muslims using crusades in Europe, but these were not doing it for religion although they used their faith to commit these atrocities,” he said.

Several students tasked the University administration to explain what they had done to guard them against possible attacks. They said apart from a few security personnel manning entrances to a few premises, the rest of the University remained open and prone to possible attacks.

Other participants asked authorities to pay more attention to sensitizing the youth on the negative impact of joining terror groups, saying since some attackers at Garissa were students, ‘everyone was a potential terrorist’.

A Somali student, Abdirisaq Muhammed Sabriye who said was twice a victim of terror attack said although the attackers in Kenya targeted Christian students; Al Shabaab terrorists had killed more Muslims in Somalia by attacking mosques.

He however complained that killings inside Somalia had attracted less World attention.

The deputy principal, college of humanities and social sciences, Prof. Abbas Kiyimba said the University community was the best suited to discuss and advise government on how it could deal with terrorism and promised to organize more dialogues. “The more we invest in dialogue the better for us,” he said.

Friday, April 10, 2015

MAKING SENSE OF THE EVENTS IN YEMEN

MAKING SENSE OF THE EVENTS IN YEMEN
By A group of students of Islamic Studies, The Hawza, Qom
Date: 07/Jamadi II/1436; 28/March, 2015

The forgotten country of Yemen is suddenly in the news. The Gulf Arab States led by Saudi Arabia and supported by Egypt and Jordan have launched a military attack on it. The USA and Turkey say they support the attack while Iran, Hizbullah and Russia have condemned it. The meagre media coverage of events in Yemen often mentions rebels called "Houthis".

What's happening and why? Who are the Houthis? What’s going to happen? Here are a few observations meant to provide those concerned about injustice in the world and are striving to reduce it, especially Muslims, a better understanding of the situation.

Yemen – General Information

Yemen is a Muslim, Arab country to the south of Saudi Arabia. The country is mostly mountainous but also has large stretches of desolate desert. It has a long coastline and an important port at Aden, control of which can translate into control over the Suez Canal shipping route. It has a large and fast-growing population that at 25 million is even greater than Saudi Arabia’s.

In terms of religious belief, between 30-40% of the population is "Zaydi"; the rest are mostly Shafi'ii Sunni. Wahhabi teachings appear to have little acceptance in society. The social structure is essentially tribal in nature. The influence of modernity on the beliefs and lifestyle of the people is still relatively slight and material standards of living are low; these are important features to consider when seeking to understand present developments. Yemen has no oil. Most people view Yemen as a backward, poor country of little consequence.

Yemen – History

Unlike nearly every other Arab country, Yemen is not an entity created in the 20th century by European colonial powers. It enjoys historical continuity of several centuries and has a rich culture and history. In the past couple of centuries however, Yemen has been a battleground between competing foreign powers – at first the British dominated the country and then in the second half of the 20th Century the Americans did, although neither of them directly ruled the country. Their domination brought with it the usual "divide-and-rule" policies that prevented Yemeni society from progressing politically and socially.

Things went so far that in 1967 Yemen was split into two separate countries, one allied with the American-Saudis and the other with the former Soviet Union. The two Yemens were then goaded into going to war with each other, finally re-uniting in 1990 under complete American-Israeli-GCC domination, an association of powers that we shall call "The Oppression Axis". Ali Abdullah Saleh was installed as President. His long rule over Yemen had the usual hallmarks of Western-backed "strongman-rule" the world over - nepotism, runaway social injustice, suppression of dissent, and subservience to foreign interests. Saudi Arabia in particular acquired enormous influence in every aspect of Yemeni public life.

2011 Uprising – Thwarted, Unfinished
Yemen was one of the countries most severely shaken by the wave of popular uprisings that swept through the Arab world that year. People from across different regions, sects and tribes rose up in unity to demand the overthrow of the ruling system and to express hatred for the foreigners that controlled it. The pressure from the masses was so great that many of Saleh’s allies publicly dumped him. Saleh offered some concessions to the public, but obstinately clung on to power.

To forestall a full-blown revolution that could lead to a complete dismantling of their control, the Oppression Axis worked through the UN and prevailed upon Saleh to cede power to his vice-president Mansur Hadi as a compromise solution. Hadi became President in early 2012 through an election in which he was the only candidate, and promised a new era of justice, freedom and democracy. As everywhere else in the Arab World, the Arab Spring in Yemen too appeared to have lost direction and steam. But not everyone was satisfied with this compromise; certain groups, the most important of them being the "Houthis", viewed it as a sell-out and as a setback. However they did not openly oppose this compromise, choosing instead to prepare for the time when it would inevitably unravel.

From Houthis to Ansarallah
The Houthis is a term used to describe a collection of mostly Zaydi tribes based in North Yemen that have emerged over the past two decades as the most dynamic political movement in Yemen. At the time of writing, they are in control of the entire North, the Western Coast, the capital city San’aa, and most of the other major population centres. They now also control territory around the port of Aden in the south. This movement came to be known as "Houthi" as all its leaders have up until now belonged to the "Houthi" clan. However the movement prefers to be called by the name it has chosen for itself – "Ansarullah", or God’s Helpers.

The Zaydi sect of Muslims is defined by its belief that Zayd As-Shaheed’s (r.a.) – son of the 4th Shia Isna Ash’ari Imam – was an "Imam", and that his uprising against the corrupt Umayyad dynasty in the year 122 A.H., set the role-model for subsequent Muslim leaders and masses to follow. The Zaydi sect is usually described as a shia sect, but some scholars disagree. But there is unanimity among scholars that they exhibit some of the most important features of shia Islam – specifically, their emphasis on following righteous leaders, on establishing social justice, and their embracement of the culture of personal sacrifice and martyrdom. The Zaydi have played an important role in Yemeni affairs for more than a thousand years; in fact the last Zaydi Imamate was dismantled by the Oppression Axis as recently as in the 1960s.

The Houthi/Ansarullah movement began in the mid-90s when an Islamic scholar and social activist called Husain Badruddin Al-Houthi, inspired by the Islamic Revolution led by Imam Khomeini (r.a.), began a movement in the north for social reform and justice. His movement spread rapidly among the Zaydi tribes and invariably came into conflict with the government in San’aa. A series of military battles followed over the next 15 years, often with the direct involvement of American and Saudi army and air-force units on the side of the San’aa Government.

 The Houthis performed well in these battles, even shooting down some Saudi combat planes and taking some Saudi soldiers as prisoners of war. The battles usually ended in cease-fire agreements that allowed the Houthis to regain strength and to consolidate their rule and build institutions in the areas under their control. Badruddin Al-Houthi was killed by the Yemeni Government in 2004, and since then his brothers have led the movement. At present the movement is led by one of his brothers, Abdul Malik Al-Houthi, who at a reported 33 years of age is remarkably young.

The events of 2014 – Ansarullah sweeps into popular control over San’aa
Not surprisingly, the replacement of Saleh with Hadi in 2012 did not bring about any significant change in the situation in Yemen. Popular resentment against the ruling system began to grow again, exploding in renewed anger at the doubling of fuel prices in July 2014.

Ansarullah moved swiftly and decisively. Using what it had learned from the 2011 uprising, it raised slogans seeking justice not just for the marginalized Zaydi tribes but for all Yemenis. Non-violent confrontation with the state was prioritized. Riding a wave of popular support and trust, Ansarullah swept into San’aa in September of 2014, bringing the capital to a stand-still with massive demonstrations that brought President Hadi’s government to its knees. Government TV channels and some other elements of the state apparatus came under Ansarullah control. Many military units pledged support for Ansarullah. The long-standing military nemesis of the Zaydis, the feared Maj.-Gen. Ahmar abandoned his palace and fled San’aa and possibly, Yemen.

Once again, the Oppression Axis moved through the UN to secure a deal – fuel prices were rolled back, Hadi sacked his entire cabinet and announced a new power-sharing "unity government" with Ansarullah. But it was of no use; the momentum was clearly with the revolutionary movement. To keep the pressure on, unarmed Ansarullah supporters continued to camp in San’aa supported by a sympathetic public; they were frequently targeted by bombings that led to the death of many.

From October to December of 2014, there was intense political friction between Ansarullah and the Hadi Government Elite and their foreign backers; each side claimed the other was a foreign stooge that had precipitated the crisis and was obstructing its solution. Ansarullah and Saudi-backed tribes and salafists also fought battles in several cities, with Ansarullah winning nearly everywhere. Curiously, deposed President Ali Abdullah Saleh also came out in support of the revolutionaries. Ansarullah’s power continued to increase day by day, and it increased pressure on the Hadi-led ruling elite to act per the agreements of the September power-sharing pact, and in line with the genuine interests of the Yemeni people. Hadi was still officially the President, but people had set their hearts on the revolutionaries. Support for Ansarullah among the masses, including among the non-Zaydi inhabitants of Yemen, continued to grow day by day.

The Empire Strikes Back
At the start of 2015, the Hadi Government elite and their foreign backers in various Arab capitals, Tel Aviv and Washington found themselves facing a nightmare – here was a genuine (unlike the ISIL and other caricatures) and sensible Islamic movement, one that enjoyed support across followers of different Muslims sects, which looked up to Iran and Hizbullah for inspiration and had a sharp anti-American and anti-Israeli stand, that was set to assume power in an Arab state. The Oppression Axis knew that if this were to be allowed to happen in even one Arab country, it would electrify genuine Islamic movements the world over and weaken ISIS-type caricatures everywhere. It had to act.

Once again the "chaos option" was selected; rather than seek to fruitlessly confront and contain this powerful revolutionary movement, the Oppression Axis decided instead to ensure that the revolutionary momentum building up in in Yemeni society would be dissipated into fruitless and damaging endeavours – specifically, into sectarian and tribal in-fighting and civil wars.

The rapid-fire developments of 2015
So when in January 2015 Ansarullah attempted to further pressurize President Hadi by limiting his control to just the Presidential Palace compound in San’aa, Hadi and his cabinet dramatically announced their resignation. Ansarullah immediately called a "National Conference" of all tribes and parties to find a way out of this political crisis, but this conference did not arrive at any clear result. In early February Ansarullah declared it was formally taking over power to fill the power vacuum created by Hadi’s resignation, and established a Revolutionary Committee to rule the country and oversee transition to a new political order.

With the capital San’aa now an Ansarullah stronghold, Aden became the focus of anti-Ansarullah efforts. Hadi and his entourage managed to reach Aden, and after announcing a withdrawal of their resignations, declared Aden to be the new capital of Yemen. The Arab Gulf States and other allied governments shut their embassies in San’aa and began to re-open them in Aden. The stage was set for Yemen to be split into two once again.

The conflicting sides realised that speed was of the essence. Hadi and his foreign backers knew they must act very fast to establish an alternative state structure centred in Aden; with this in place, they could then depict the San’aa government as illegitimate, and drag the internal conflict on for decades. Ansarullah understood that it must prevent this from happening. It was clear that armed conflict was going to escalate, and rapidly too.

Ansarullah pressed forward towards Aden in March, making rapid military advances with the help of popular support. Bomb blasts during Friday prayers in San’aa killed more than 150 Zaydi worshippers on the 20th of March, but failed to dampen Ansarullah’s momentum. ISIS claimed responsibility for these blasts while Iran airlifted the injured to Tehran for medical treatment. The fall of Aden appeared imminent. Panic gripped the anti-Ansarullah camp; Elite US Special Forces abandoned their Al Anad airbase near Aden and fled the country. President Hadi and his supporters too disappeared, apparently fleeing
by sea to Oman.

A Combined attack on Yemen
On the 25th of March, Hadi’s foreign minister appeared in Cairo and appealed for an international coalition to attack Ansarullah. The Oppression Axis responded as per plan; the GCC and other countries issued statements claiming to respond to this request for assistance from Yemen’s legitimate government authority, and began their assault on Yemen. The governments of USA, UK and Turkey expressed support for the attack. There are unconfirmed reports of Pakistan preparing to join the attack. On the other hand Iran, Iraq, Syria, Hizbullah – an association of forces we can label as the "Resistance Axis" - have condemned it. So has Russia.

As of writing, the attack appears to have been limited to two main elements – the aerial bombardment of Zaydi population centres, and an air and sea blockade of the country. The bombardment aims to create terror, demoralization and ultimately disunity among Ansarullah’s core support base. However this appears to have back-fired at least for the moment; massive crowds now throng the major northern cities screaming in anger and hatred at America, Israel and Saudi Arabia. The blockade aims to prevent arms and other supplies from reaching the Yemenis so that they can eventually be forced to back down. In any case, it appears that Aden may now be under Ansarullah control but this is not entirely clear. The sparsely populated east of Yemen, bordering both Saudia Arabia and Oman, is apparently not yet under Ansarullah control.

Looking to the future
Will the attacking countries launch a ground invasion as well, hiring the Pakistani or Egyptian armies for the purpose? Will they unleash the ISIS hordes on Yemen too? Will the Ansarullah movement hold together despite the sectarian and tribal differences in Yemeni society? Will their leadership be able to avoid major mistakes, especially considering the absence of senior Islamic scholars? What will the effect of former President Saleh’s support for Ansarullah be? These and other questions engage the minds of those observing Yemeni events. Providing specific answers to these questions is very difficult; instead, we will close this article with a mention of some important considerations that impact any analysis of current events in Yemen.

The Oppression Axis’ immediate goals are to ensure disunity and paralysis in Yemen as a pre-cursor to rolling back the revolutionary movement through internal disunity. At the minimum, it wants Yemen to go back to being an invisible and inconsequential Saudi satellite. At a larger level, it sees the Yemen crisis as another opportunity to achieve its grand dream of triggering a massive sectarian civil war between Muslims across West Asia; this partly explains its attempts to expand the military coalition attacking Yemen to include other Sunni-majority countries such as Pakistan. This Axis banks on its superior military, financial and media power, and on the support of client regimes across the Muslim world, to achieve its goals.

In contrast, the Ansarullah movement and its sympathisers across the Resistance Axis seek to establish and consolidate power over a united Yemen in the short term. At a larger level, they seek to set up a revolutionary, anti-imperialist Islamic State in Yemen as another stepping stone to further deepening the revolutionary movement across the world. The Resistance Axis draws its power primarily from Islamic Ideology, popular support and superior strategic leadership; its leaders believe that God has promised those who engage in brave, just and sensible resistance against the world’s oppressors, enormous divine assistance.

What happens in Yemen, and indeed in West Asia and beyond, will depend on how this clash of wills between members of The Oppression Axis and the Resistance Axis plays out. Both Islamic ideology and trends over the past few decades indicate that victory for the Resistance Axis is more likely. However, this does not mean that its victory will be swift; the path to victory may be paved with several small defeats and setbacks as well.

In any case, the most influential human actors on this stage are in fact the ordinary Muslim masses. It is their  level of understanding of the issues at stake and the motives at play, their level of commitment to Islamic ideals, and their courage to make the choices required to bring those ideas to life, that will have the biggest influence on how Yemen, and indeed the rest of Muslim world, shapes up in the years to come.
-